10 myths about net zero targets and carbon offsetting, busted.

The idea of carbon offsetting, which underpins so-called net zero targets, is founded on a number of myths:

Myth 1: Net zero by 2050 is sufficient to solve the climate crisis. Misleading.
Myth 2: We can compensate for fossil fuel emissions using so-called “nature-based solutions” (such as carbon sequestration in vegetation and soils). Misleading.
Myth 3: Net zero targets as well as carbon offsetting increase the incentives to reduce emissions because emissions are allocated a cost. Misleading
Myth 4: Carbon offsetting in low-income countries must increase to meet the Paris agreement. Misleading.
Myth 5: Funding renewable energy projects is a good way to compensate for fossil fuel emissions. Problematic.
Myth 6: Technological solutions for carbon dioxide removal will solve the problem. Overly optimistic.
Myth 7: Tree plantations capture more carbon than leaving old forests undisturbed. Misleading.
Myth 8: Planting trees in the tropics is a cost-effective win-win solution for both nature and local communities. Oversimplified.
Myth 9: Each ton of carbon dioxide is the same and can be treated interchangeably. False.
Myth 10: Products and travel can be “climate neutral” or even “climate positive”. False.